Why directors need to get out of the way

Every leader is one of three things: an inspiring mentor, a forgettable blip, or a terrible story that colleagues tell to get a laugh at the bar. Directors prompt a lot of bar stories.
[This is archived content and may not display in the originally intended format.]

Each director, teacher, and boss I’ve had has fallen into one of those three categories: they inspire me and I’m still working with them, they provided me with stories that begin with “I once had a director who…” or they, well…I don’t really remember the others.

Being a leader is a complex affair. You must simultaneously know what’s best for everyone, communicate it clearly, and know when to lean back and let the work get done. Harold Clurman, in On Directing, sets the bar pretty high for being a director. “The director,” he writes, “must be an organizer, a teacher, a politician, a psychic detective, a lay analyst, a technician, a creative being. Ideally, [they] should know literature (drama), acting, the psychology of the actor, the visual arts, music, history and above all, [they] must understand people.” That’s a platonic ideal if I’ve ever heard one. As a director, I’m continually trying to live up to this ideal of skill and knowledge—if I achieve half these attributes in my lifetime, I’ll be happy.

Unlock Padlock Icon

Unlock this content?

Access this content and more

Phil Weaver-Stoesz
About the Author
Phil Weaver-Stoesz is a multi-disciplinary director, devisor, and performer studying and working at Arizona State University.